WHY DID GOD PUNISH ELI FOR THE SINS OF HIS SONS?
Eli the priest
of God at Shiloh was very old when a man of God came to him and declared the
horrific judgement of God against him on account of the sins of his sons of
which the Lord said he was an accomplice.
Of course Eli
wasn’t an accomplice in the sense that he practically committed the sins with
his children or that he approved of their immoralities.
Now the sons of Eli were sons of Belial; they knew not
the Lord.
Wherefore the sin of the young men was very great
before the Lord: for men abhorred the offering of the Lord.
Now Eli was very old, and heard all that his sons did
unto all Israel; and how they lay with the women that assembled at the door of
the tabernacle of the congregation.
—1 Samuel 2:12, 17, 22
God declared to Eli
that He was going to disinherit him, his family and his coming generation from
being priests; He was going to bring in enemies who would torment his family;
He would ensure that nobody in his family lives to see old age; that his family
members would die prematurely; that anyone of his remaining at the altar will
only be to frustrate him of all his donkey’s years of service; that his two
sons Hophni and Phinehas were going to die suddenly in one day; that He would
replace him with an entirely different person as His priest; that everyone in
his family will eventually go to the new priest, falling down before him and
asking for a piece of silver, small portion of meal for sustenance and pleading
to be in any of the temple services just so he could eat; and that the sins of
his household shall never be purged, not by sacrifice nor offering. (1 Sam.
2:27-36)
These are horrific
judgements against Eli. Why didn’t God just punish the two men that sinned and
leave the high priest and the remaining members of the household alone?
For I have told him that I will judge his house for ever
for the iniquity which he knoweth; because his sons made themselves vile, and
he restrained them not.
—1 Sam. 3:13
Due to the above
text, some people say that Eli did not reprimand his sons; for that reason God
punished him together with them. But this is not true, for Eli indeed did
rebuke his sons quite sternly.
And he said unto them, Why do ye such things? for I
hear of your evil dealings by all this people. Nay, my sons; for it is no good
report that I hear: ye make the LORD's people to transgress. If one man sin
against another, the judge shall judge him: but if a man sin against the LORD,
who shall entreat for him? Notwithstanding they hearkened not unto the voice of
their father, because the LORD would slay them.
—1 Sam. 2:23-25
Some people say
perhaps his words were not grave enough, that he did not charge them so
seriously as he should, or that he was petting them (like patting them on the
back) with words as one would seek to woo a brat out of their silliness.
We do not,
however, have clear evidence that Eli was not mean with his words when he
rebuked his sons. Albeit, by this word of the Lord, “he restrained them not,”
we understand that whereas Eli had the power and know-how to prevent his
children from the temple sacrilege, he did not exert them. He could and should
have restrained them, not merely with words, but he did not.
The question
then is: How should he have restrained them? Simple: remove them from being
priests and from all temple services and deny them of all the benefits thereof,
even if that would mean their starvation. This has always been God’s
instruction both in the Old and New Testaments regarding defiant offenders in
the midst of His people.
Ø
When Israel went astray, Moses
declared separation of the holy from the unholy. All Levi came to him and he
commanded them to slay all offenders (Ex. 32:26-28). Levi was later praised and
blessed for this (Deu. 33:8-9).
Ø
God’s wrath against the
Israelites was placated when one Phinehas slew a man who was at the moment
committing sexual immorality in the presence of God, Moses and the whole holy
assembly (Num. 25:6-13).
Ø
Priests and temple servants
were commanded to be punctilious with all codes regarding their duties; otherwise
they were unholy and should quit.
Now in the New Covenant we neither kill people nor practice the code
of the Law, but the principle of sanctity in God’s service remains the same.
Ø
“A man that is an heretic (or, as in this case, unruly), after the
first and second admonition, reject; knowing that he that is such is
subverted...” (Titus 3:10-11).
Ø
“...concerning him that hath so
done this deed (sexual immorality),
in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ... deliver such an one unto Satan...” (1
Cor. 5:3-5).
Ø
“I have written unto you not to
keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous...”
—as Eli’s sons (1 Cor. 5:11).
Ø
Those who dishonour God’s holy
ordinance attract terrible judgement against themselves. “For this cause many
are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep” (1 Cor. 11:30).
Eli was expected
of God to mete out judgement on his children by removing them from service; but
he did not, because he cared for their welfare (feeding and all) above the
holiness of God and sanctity of worship.
[Thou] honourest thy sons above me, to make yourselves
fat with the chiefest of all the offerings...
—1 Sam. 2:29
The sin of Eli
was not that he failed to rebuke; rather he failed to go beyond that when it
was demanded that he should. Eli should have “restrained” those obstinate, defiant, unrepentant sinning sons of
his by throwing them away from ministry and the temple. But he didn’t. Hence the
judgement of God came upon him, his sons, his whole house and generation, for
such sin of theirs is cancerous and so should the judgement be.
...a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump.... Purge
out therefore the old leaven that ye may be a new lump, as ye are
unleavened....
—1 Cor. 5:5-7
Comments
Post a Comment